First
off, Chris Wallace was the only unbiased commentator during the debate season.
He put all the others to shame by protecting the integrity of the debate
process; refusing to be manipulated by the Clinton Cartel as evidenced in
prior mainstream media events. From the beginning, it was obvious Hillary
was not as comfortable. She knew this debate was a totally different ball
game. Wallace was not on her “team,” nor was he on Mr. Trump’s. He wanted the truth to come out, and it worked, for the most part.
Mr. Trump is pro-life and wants to defund Planned Parenthood. Hillary
once again voiced her ardent support of abortion. When accused of supporting "children being ripped from the womb days before birth,” she
not only didn’t bat an eye but smiled. Smiled! Then
came the same old rhetoric that Planned Parenthood provides necessary
healthcare and cancer screening. (Please note, Planned Parenthood does not perform mammograms.) She failed to mention community health
centers outnumber Planned Parenthood clinics 20 to 1 and they do provide comprehensive
healthcare. Abortion is NOT healthcare.
Gun
control? Well, let's see. Mr. Trump supports the second
amendment. Hillary said she does too, but wants stricter controls. She had no comment when reminded Chicago has the strictest gun
control laws and the highest crime rate. She then weaved around and
said tougher gun laws would protect toddlers. Forceps, abortion pills
and aspiration machines are much more of a threat. They have killed
millions of children and she's all for it.
She
claims to be a champion for women and children (I’ve already addressed the
children) and Mr. Trump asked how can she be a champion of women when
the Clinton Foundation accepts millions from countries that brutalize, demoralize
and denigrate them plus kill homosexuals. He
said in fairness to the women she champions as well as homosexuals, she should send the money back. He
also reminded her of Haiti and the people there hating the foundation because
they took advantage of them rather than help. Hillary’s response to both?
Dodge and weave AND pivot. She ignored the question regarding accepting money from countries such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. She said the foundation helped in Haiti (see this video) and the
foundation gives 90% of proceeds to charity. What? Fact-check here.
I was happy to see Chris Wallace stop her midstream as she attempted to sing
the praises of the foundation rather than address the issues.
Hillary
couldn’t dodge and weave about open borders. She flat out lied about
it by saying she didn’t want open borders. Chris Matthews called her on it,
and she responded with some gibberish about electricity. What was that all
about?
When
confronted about the missing e-mails and her using her personal servers to transmit confidential information, she smugly announced the FBI cleared her. Huh?
Did she forget Mr. Comey is before Congress right now because of his flagrant bias
towards Clinton and disregard for the law?
She
didn’t have any answers for the Wiki-leaks e-mails other than it was the
because of the Russians. She did not address the contents whatsoever.
As to the source of the e-mails, I will repeat one of her most famous
statements, “What
difference does it make?” The only thing
that matters is the CONTENT. They expose corruption and bigotry as well as insolent comments towards Evangelical Christians and the campaign's hope to provoke a "Catholic Spring". As
to the videos that prove corruption and voter fraud, she dodged and weaved
again.
It
was nice to see Mr. Trump standing proud and presidential and Hillary squirm.
She had no moderator to handle her with kid gloves and it showed in her face,
the sweat beading on her upper lip and her glaring eyes.
Before
anyone comes back with Mr. Trump falling back on his promise to accept the
results of the election if he doesn’t win (and that to me is a BIG if) …. Think
about it. It has been proven the Clinton Cartel is doing all they can to
manipulate and bully voters. The have incited violence at Trump rallies
and bragged about how they get people to vote in several jurisdictions PLUS how
to use fraudulent identification. Concerns have surfaced after voting
machines were found showing discrepancies in the ballots entered versus results
(and let us not forget George Soros owns a company (see here) that provides voting
machines for sixteen states). As a mature, common sense person,
would YOU accept the results if they appeared tainted? Ask Al Gore.
He took the results to the Supreme Court.
Yes,
Mr. Trump had a few uncomfortable moments as well, but he didn’t have to
consistently dodge and weave to avoid answers regarding criminal activities
and/or admit to lies. Yes, I squirmed when he called Hillary a
“nasty woman”, but what the heck, the truth is the truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment