Thanks to political correctness, certain terms have been
high-jacked to strengthen and advance a socialist agenda. Words such as tolerance, equality, and diversity are now battle cries for a socialist society.
The definition of tolerance is “a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward opinions, beliefs, and practices that differ from one's own.” It is evident
today the definition has changed. The
only way to be tolerant, according to liberals, is to accept everything they
say and if not, expect riots, demonstrations, threats, and physical/verbal
personal attacks. Liberals utilize what they claim are first amendment rights (except
for the riots, threats, attacks) yet deny those same rights to anyone with
opposing views. A recent case in point: Conservative speaker Ann Coulter’s canceled appearance
at UC Berkeley due to threats of demonstrations and possible violence from
leftist students. Denying anyone the
right to share an alternative viewpoint (and in Ms. Coulter’s case, the TRUTH),
is akin to censorship which is one of the pillars of Socialism.
Let’s move on
to equality. The preamble to the
Constitution states that “All men are created equal.” Yes, we are all created equal, but through circumstance, our paths are not. In this day and age, contrary to the liberal rhetoric, we all have the same
opportunities. It’s what we do with
those opportunities that determine our
station in life. The left believes all
paths should converge and wealth redistributed regardless if those less
fortunate ended up in that position due to squandered opportunities and bad
choices. Sadly, liberal logic also calls
for punishing the successful by taxing
them to the max. Why? I wonder if it has anything to do with all
the government freebies (healthcare, food stamps, welfare, cell-phones, birth
control, abortion) paid for by those same taxes. Guess what? Redistribution
of wealth and government dependence are also pillars
of Socialism.
Diversity is
what makes our country great, or at least it did. We used to celebrate the presence of different
ethnic backgrounds and cultures within our borders, but now diversity has taken
an immoral and illegal turn by including
homosexuality and “undocumented” immigrants. People of faith are taught to love
their neighbors, and we do. That doesn’t mean we should be forced to
abandon our beliefs and values by accepting and celebrating behavior that goes
against God’s teachings and the law, yet that’s the way it is today.
Following our
faith and defending the sanctity of marriage now results in civil action.
Remember the cake? A baker refused to
bake one for a gay wedding because it went against his religious beliefs. Instead of the couple respecting the baker’s
faith and going elsewhere, they decided to sue, thus putting the baker out of
business (reverse diversity?) Speaking out against behavior that is contrary to
God’s word is not only unacceptable but also prosecutable.
We are also
expected to accept illegal immigrants into our diverse society. It doesn’t matter that we have no idea of
their background. Granted, not all
illegal immigrants are dangerous criminals (they are breaking the law, however) but how many murderers, drug dealers and child molesters have crossed the same border? Without vetting, we have no idea. So, thanks to the liberal lawmakers, law
enforcement and ICE officials can’t enforce immigration law and protect communities. Additionally, there are inadequate (or ignored) controls for handing out
welfare checks and food stamps and hardworking citizens pay for it all through their hard-earned
tax dollars. In regards to taxes, while citizens struggle with taxes every year, illegals are able to claim a $1,000 tax credit per child WITHOUT a Social Security number and get federal money? And if that's not bad enough, IRS encourages illegals to use fraudulent Social Security numbers to file taxes, and rest assured their are millions lost in fraudulent refunds as well.
If liberals
have it their way, we will all be forced to live in an immoral and valueless society with no respect for law and order.
Of course, they don’t see it that
way. Through their rose-colored glasses,
they see one big, government controlled, happy family. Hence,
another pillar of socialism.
Is that really
how you want to live?
You pretty well identified what needs to be said. What I noticed many years ago about liberals is that they will focus attention on any specific detail that they can twist or present as supporting the action they want while ignoring everything that that is harmful or undesirable about their proposal. And they will take the totally opposite position later if what they promoted today turns out to have been usable against them in regard to some other act.
ReplyDeleteNote that every government law or regulation always reduces our freedom of choice and frequently also adds cost to products and services. Laws and regulations are never free. Thus any reasonable law must provide a net increase in freedom or provide a benefit that has greater value than the freedom lost or the cost increase of compliance.
(Note: an example of a law that gives an increase in net freedom is the law requiring drivers to drive on only one side of a street.)
James Harris
Agree wholeheartedly!
Delete